Registry Data Confirm Increase in Bleeding with Noncardiac Surgery After PCI vs CABG

Download this article's Factoid (PDF & PPT for Gold Subscribers)

Noncardiac surgery carries similar ischemic risk for patients who have recently undergone revascularization irrespective of whether they received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, reports a Japanese registry study published online July 29, 2014, ahead of print in Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. However, bleeding complications are far more common among patients with prior PCI. 

The difference in bleeding risk may stem from greater use of dual antiplatelet therapy among PCI patients, Takeshi Kimura, MD, of Kyoto University (Kyoto, Japan), and colleagues note. 

Methods
Researchers looked at the outcomes of noncardiac surgery in 14,383 patients who underwent first coronary revascularization (12,207 PCI and 2,176 CABG) and were enrolled in the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2 from 2005 to 2007.
CABG patients were more likely to have diabetes, heart failure, multivessel disease, prior MI or stroke, peripheral vascular disease, renal failure, A-fib, and anemia, while PCI patients were more likely to present with ACS, receive emergency revascularization, and be current smokers. The most frequent type of noncardiac surgery was vascular (17%), such as scheduled repair of AAA after CABG. Predictors of surgery were advanced age, malignancy, and peripheral vascular disease.


In the 3 years following revascularization, noncardiac surgery was performed in a greater proportion of CABG patients compared with PCI patients (27% vs 22%; P < .0001). The difference reached statistical significance within the first 6 months (P < .0001) but not thereafter (P = .04). Adjusting for baseline differences, CABG continued to be associated with greater incidence of noncardiac surgery vs PCI (HR 1.15; 95% CI 1.03-1.29; P = .02). 

Surgeries tended to occur earlier after CABG than after PCI, and dual vs single antiplatelet therapy was more common in PCI patients. A trend was seen toward greater use of general/spinal anesthesia in procedures following CABG (table 1). 

Table 1. Characteristics of Noncardiac Surgery

 

After PCI 
 (n = 2,398) 

After CABG 
 (n = 560) 

P Value

Surgery < 6 Weeks

15%

26%

< .0001

Perioperative Antiplatelet Therapy

    Dual

    Single

 

27%

20%

 

3.1%

44%

 

< .0001

General/Spinal Anesthesia

45%

50%

.053

 

At 30 days, the risk of ischemic events (death/MI) was similar for both cohorts, while bleeding events (GUSTO moderate/severe) trended higher in PCI patients. With adjustment, the difference in bleeding became significant (P = .02; table 2).

Table 2. Thirty-Day Outcomes: Crude Rates and Adjusted Risk

 

After PCI 
 (n = 2,398) 

After CABG 
 (n = 560) 

P Value 

Adjusted HR 
 (95% CI)  

Ischemic

3.2%

3.1%

.9

0.97 (0.47-1.89)

Bleeding

2.6%

1.3%

.07

0.36 (0.12-0.87)

 

Most ischemic events were death, with similar rates of overall and cardiac death seen in the CABG and PCI groups. However, half of the 41 cardiac deaths occurring in PCI patients were related to complications of MI that occurred before noncardiac surgery. 

There were no interactions between the timing of noncardiac surgery and the types of revascularization for either ischemic or bleeding outcomes. 

Better PCI Antiplatelet Regimen Might Minimize Postsurgical Bleeding  

Dr. Kimura and colleagues could not distinguish between noncardiac surgery that was already scheduled at the time of revascularization and procedures whose need only became evident at a later date. 

“Nevertheless,” the authors say, “it seems plausible that patients scheduled for surgical procedures after coronary revascularization were more likely to undergo CABG rather than PCI, because early surgical procedures after coronary stent implantation, DES in particular, were reported to be associated with prohibitive risk for both ischemic and bleeding complications.” 

The researchers propose that perioperative dual antiplatelet therapy in PCI patients is responsible for the increased bleeding after noncardiac surgery. If true, there is room to improve practice, they suggest.

“Perioperative bleeding complications could be reduced with more appropriate perioperative management of [antiplatelet therapy],” they conclude. “Therefore, both PCI and CABG could be viable options in patients who are scheduled for noncardiac surgery after coronary revascularization.”

 


Source: 
Tokushige A, Shiomi H, Morimoto T, et al. Incidence and outcome of surgical procedures after coronary artery bypass grafting compared with those after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; Epub ahead of print. 

Related Stories:

Caitlin E. Cox is News Editor of TCTMD and Associate Director, Editorial Content at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation. She produces the…

Read Full Bio
Disclosures
  • The study was supported by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency in Japan.
  • Dr. Kimura reports serving as an advisory board member for Abbott Vascular and Terumo.

Comments