Search - tctmd.com

Displaying 1 - 20 of 27

Sort: Relevancy | Date

Inconsistencies between positive results of iFR and FFR are age dependent

Presentation TCT Abstracts Posters 2018

Inconsistencies between positive results of iFR and FFR are age dependent

Presenter: Przemyslaw Lipski

September 25, 2018

The Role of FFR, iFR, and iMR in Assessing Non-Culprit Lesions and Vessels in STEMI

Presentation TCT 2018

The Role of FFR, iFR, and iMR in Assessing Non-Culprit Lesions and Vessels in STEMI

Presenter: Anthony H. Gershlick, Pieter C. Smits, Joo Myung Lee

September 24, 2018

The Role of FFR, iFR, iMR, and WIA In Evaluating Culprit Lesion and Vessel Flow In STEMI

Presentation TCT 2018

The Role of FFR, iFR, iMR, and WIA In Evaluating Culprit Lesion and Vessel Flow In STEMI

Presenter: Morton J. Kern, Graham Nichol, Kalpa De Silva

September 24, 2018

Presentation TCT 2018

Pro iFR!

Presenter: Jacques Monsegu

September 24, 2018

Presentation TCT 2018

Pro FFR!

Presenter: Daniel H. Berrocal

September 24, 2018

Is iFR Guided Revascularization Effective and Cost Saving?

Presentation TCT 2018

Is iFR Guided Revascularization Effective and Cost Saving?

Presenter: Justin E. Davies, Matthias Götberg

September 24, 2018

Physiology Case Vignette #5: Utilization of iFR in Complex PCI

Presentation TCT 2018

Physiology Case Vignette #5: Utilization of iFR in Complex PCI

Presenter: Justin E. Davies, Matthias Götberg, Joseph P. Carrozza Jr, Michalis Hamilos, Leandro I Lasave, Samer Mansour, Sukhjinder S Nijjer, Seung-Jung Park, Andrew Sharp

September 24, 2018

Case #12: A Case Demonstrating the Potential Utility of QFR

Presentation TCT 2018

Case #12: A Case Demonstrating the Potential Utility of QFR

Presenter: Justin E. Davies, Javier Escaned, Felix Bohm, Matthias Götberg, Michalis Hamilos, Niels R. Holm, Erick Schampaert, Adhir Shroff

September 23, 2018

Case #11: A Case of Demonstrating the Potential Utility of vFFR

Presentation TCT 2018

Case #11: A Case of Demonstrating the Potential Utility of vFFR

Presenter: Justin E. Davies, Javier Escaned, Felix Bohm, Matthias Götberg, Michalis Hamilos, Niels R. Holm, Erick Schampaert, Adhir Shroff

September 23, 2018

Case #10: A Case Demonstrating the Resting Full-Cycle Ratio (RFR)

Presentation TCT 2018

Case #10: A Case Demonstrating the Resting Full-Cycle Ratio (RFR)

Presenter: Justin E. Davies, Javier Escaned, Felix Bohm, Matthias Götberg, Michalis Hamilos, Niels R. Holm, Erick Schampaert, Adhir Shroff

September 23, 2018

Case #9: A Case in Which it Was Preferable To Measure Coronary Flow, Not Pressure

Presentation TCT 2018

Case #9: A Case in Which it Was Preferable To Measure Coronary Flow, Not Pressure

Presenter: Justin E. Davies, Javier Escaned, Felix Bohm, Matthias Götberg, Michalis Hamilos, Niels R. Holm, Erick Schampaert, Adhir Shroff

September 23, 2018

Case #8: A Case of Culprit and Non-Culprit Lesion Assessment in ACS: FFR, iFR, Both or Nither?

Presentation TCT 2018

Case #8: A Case of Culprit and Non-Culprit Lesion Assessment in ACS: FFR, iFR, Both or Nither?

Presenter: Justin E. Davies, Javier Escaned, Felix Bohm, Matthias Götberg, Michalis Hamilos, Niels R. Holm, Erick Schampaert, Adhir Shroff

September 23, 2018

Case #7: A Case With Marked Discordance Between FFR and iFR – Which to Believe?

Presentation TCT 2018

Case #7: A Case With Marked Discordance Between FFR and iFR Which to Believe?

Presenter: Justin E. Davies, Javier Escaned, Felix Bohm, Matthias Götberg, Michalis Hamilos, Niels R. Holm, Erick Schampaert, Adhir Shroff

September 23, 2018

Case #6: A Case of FFR and iFR in the Left Main – Which To Believe?

Presentation TCT 2018

Case #6: A Case of FFR and iFR in the Left Main Which To Believe?

Presenter: Justin E. Davies, Javier Escaned, Felix Bohm, Matthias Götberg, Michalis Hamilos, Niels R. Holm, Erick Schampaert, Adhir Shroff

September 23, 2018

Case #5: A Case of iFR Co-Registration To Identify Focal Treatable Disease

Presentation TCT 2018

Case #5: A Case of iFR Co-Registration To Identify Focal Treatable Disease

Presenter: Justin E. Davies, Javier Escaned, Felix Bohm, Matthias Götberg, Michalis Hamilos, Niels R. Holm, Erick Schampaert, Adhir Shroff

September 23, 2018

Case #4: A Case in Which Post-Stent FFR Assessment Changed My Treatment

Presentation TCT 2018

Case #4: A Case in Which Post-Stent FFR Assessment Changed My Treatment

Presenter: Justin E. Davies, Javier Escaned, Felix Bohm, Matthias Götberg, Michalis Hamilos, Niels R. Holm, Erick Schampaert, Adhir Shroff

September 23, 2018

Case #3: A Case in Which FFR Of A Mild Lesion Led Me To Stent

Presentation TCT 2018

Case #3: A Case in Which FFR Of A Mild Lesion Led Me To Stent

Presenter: Justin E. Davies, Javier Escaned, Felix Bohm, Matthias Götberg, Michalis Hamilos, Niels R. Holm, Erick Schampaert, Adhir Shroff

September 23, 2018

Case #2: A Case in Which 3-Vessel FFR Markedly Changed My Treatment

Presentation TCT 2018

Case #2: A Case in Which 3-Vessel FFR Markedly Changed My Treatment

Presenter: Justin E. Davies, Javier Escaned, Felix Bohm, Matthias Götberg, Michalis Hamilos, Niels R. Holm, Erick Schampaert, Adhir Shroff

September 23, 2018

Case #1: A Case of Physiological Assessment of a Myocardial Bridge

Presentation TCT 2018

Case #1: A Case of Physiological Assessment of a Myocardial Bridge

Presenter: Justin E. Davies, Javier Escaned, Felix Bohm, Matthias Götberg, Michalis Hamilos, Niels R. Holm, Erick Schampaert, Adhir Shroff

September 23, 2018

Is There a Role for FFR (or iFR) Side Branch Assessment?

Presentation TCT 2018

Is There a Role for FFR (or iFR) Side Branch Assessment?

Presenter: Antonio Colombo, Jean Fajadet, Nick Curzen

September 23, 2018

Country

First Name

Last Name

Email

Profession

Organization

Country

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.