Search - tctmd.com

Displaying 101 - 120 of 285

Sort: Relevancy | Date

Presentation TCT 2017

ABSORB PSP: Impact of Technique on Early and Late Outcomes Following Coronary Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation

Presenter: Y. S. Chandrashekhar, David J. Moliterno, Gregg W. Stone

October 31, 2017

News Conference News TCT 2017

Long-term Absorb BVS Data Continue to Disappoint

Michael O'Riordan

October 31, 2017

Presentation TCT 2017

TCT 12: Clinical, Angiographic, and Procedural Correlates of Very Late Absorb Scaffold Thrombosis Multistudy Registry Results

Presenter: Yoshinobu Onuma, Joanna J. Wykrzykowska, Stephen G. Ellis

October 31, 2017

Presentation TCT 2017

TCT 9: Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent in Small Vessel Disease -A Propensity Matched Analysis of COMPARE II, RAI, and MAASSTAD-ABSORB Prospective Studies

Presenter: Yoshinobu Onuma, Joanna J. Wykrzykowska, Alberto Barioli, MD

October 31, 2017

Presentation TCT 2017

ABSORB II: 4-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of a Bioresorbable Scaffold vs a Metallic DES in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Presenter: Robert-Jan van Geuns, Bernard R. Chevalier

October 31, 2017

Presentation TCT 2017

Association Between Scaffold Under-Expansion and Late Lumen Loss After Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation - IVUS and Angiographic Insights From the ABSORB Japan Trial

Presenter: Yoshinobu Onuma, Joanna J. Wykrzykowska, Kozo Okada, MD

October 31, 2017

Presentation TCT 2017

ABSORB 3-Year Meta-analysis: 3-Year Outcomes of a Bioresorbable Scaffold Compared to a Metallic DES From an Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Four Randomized Trials

Presenter: David P. Faxon, Joseph A. Hill, Ziad A. Ali

October 31, 2017

Presentation TCT 2017

ABSORB IV: 30-Day Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of a Bioresorbable Scaffold vs a Metallic DES in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Presenter: Patrick W. Serruys, Gregg W. Stone

October 31, 2017

Presentation TCT 2017

ABSORB III: 3-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of a Bioresorbable Scaffold vs a Metallic DES in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Presenter: Patrick W. Serruys, Stephen G. Ellis

October 31, 2017

Presentation TCT 2017

How to Interpret Noninferiority Trials (eg, ABSORB III, EVEREST II, and Others)

Presenter: Roxana Mehran, Robert W. Yeh, Sanjay Kaul

October 30, 2017

Presentation TCT 2017

Predicting The Future: Will the ABSORB III/IV Ten-Year Results Change How We Currently View Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds?

Presenter: C. Michael Gibson, Stephan Windecker, Stephan Achenbach

October 30, 2017

Presentation TCT 2017

Lessons from the ABSORB Clinical Program for the Future

Presenter: Gary S. Mintz, Seung-Jung Park, Patrick W. Serruys

October 29, 2017

News Conference News TCT 2017

TCT 2017: High Hopes in Denver for Complex PCI, Shorter DAPT Durations, TAVR Costs, and More

Shelley Wood

October 20, 2017

Presentation

Mid- and Long-term Outcome Comparisons of Absorb BVS vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent

October 17, 2017

News Daily News

Absorb BVS Again Linked to Scaffold Thrombosis at 1 Year and Beyond

Michael O'Riordan

October 17, 2017

News Daily News

Bioresorbable Scaffolds Not to Be Chosen Over DES, Says European Task Force

Michael O'Riordan

October 11, 2017

News Opinion Editor's Corner

TCTMD’s Top 10 Most Popular Stories for September 2017

Shelley Wood

September 30, 2017

Top Stories in Cardiology, September 2017

Podcast Heart Sounds

Absorb Vanishes, but Can Other Bioresorbable Scaffolds Make Magic Happen?

Michael O'Riordan

September 13, 2017

News Daily News

No More Absorb BVS: Abbott Puts a Stop to Sales

Caitlin E. Cox

September 08, 2017

Advertisement

ABSORB PSP: Impact of Technique on Early and Late Outcomes Following Coronary Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation

Long-term Absorb BVS Data Continue to Disappoint

TCT 12: Clinical, Angiographic, and Procedural Correlates of Very Late Absorb Scaffold Thrombosis Multistudy Registry Results

TCT 9: Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent in Small Vessel Disease -A Propensity Matched Analysis of COMPARE II, RAI, and MAASSTAD-ABSORB Prospective Studies

ABSORB II: 4-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of a Bioresorbable Scaffold vs a Metallic DES in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Association Between Scaffold Under-Expansion and Late Lumen Loss After Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation - IVUS and Angiographic Insights From the ABSORB Japan Trial

ABSORB 3-Year Meta-analysis: 3-Year Outcomes of a Bioresorbable Scaffold Compared to a Metallic DES From an Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Four Randomized Trials

ABSORB IV: 30-Day Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of a Bioresorbable Scaffold vs a Metallic DES in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

ABSORB III: 3-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of a Bioresorbable Scaffold vs a Metallic DES in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

How to Interpret Noninferiority Trials (eg, ABSORB III, EVEREST II, and Others)

Predicting The Future: Will the ABSORB III/IV Ten-Year Results Change How We Currently View Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds?

Lessons from the ABSORB Clinical Program for the Future

TCT 2017: High Hopes in Denver for Complex PCI, Shorter DAPT Durations, TAVR Costs, and More

Mid- and Long-term Outcome Comparisons of Absorb BVS vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent

Absorb BVS Again Linked to Scaffold Thrombosis at 1 Year and Beyond

Bioresorbable Scaffolds Not to Be Chosen Over DES, Says European Task Force

TCTMD’s Top 10 Most Popular Stories for September 2017

Top Stories in Cardiology, September 2017

Absorb Vanishes, but Can Other Bioresorbable Scaffolds Make Magic Happen?

No More Absorb BVS: Abbott Puts a Stop to Sales

Advertisement

Advertisement

Sign In

Forgot Your Password?

Search TCTMD

CME TITLE

Sign up for our newsletter

Search TCTMD

Submit an Event

Become a PREMIUM MEMBER or LOG IN to view exclusive content

REGISTER for free or LOG IN to view this content